Hi all,
We need to come to a
resolution on the issues raised by the ballot last month on the constitutional
amendments and the Chancellor election. Because these issues are
exceptional in that the Constitution itself prevents them from being fixed, the
Council feels that the House at large rather than itself should have the power
to resolve the issues and decide what course of action to take. A House
Convention is thus being called for Saturday, November 19 at 5:00, which will
decide the answer to the following three questions:
- Should the
quorum amendments be considered passed?
- Should the
other amendments on the ballot be considered passed, on the basis that each of
them met both the 2/3 referendum requirements and the lowered quorum
requirements?
- Should the
chancellor election be considered valid, on the basis that it met the
requirements of the aforementioned amendments?
The Avery Council will abide
by the decision of the Convention on the above three questions, whether that
decision is in the affirmative or in the negative, or to take some further
action such as a further House vote. This Convention has this authority
because the Constitution ultimately derives its power from the people; like the
Constitutional Convention last year, this Convention is the direct agent of the
Members of Avery. We feel it is necessary to call it because the current
quorum requirements effectively make the Constitution unamendable, and the only
recourse is to return to this level of the people. If you are unable to
attend the meeting and would like to appoint someone to proxy vote for you,
provide an absentee vote, or provide comments that you would like read at the
meeting, please email the Council (avery-council@ugcs) with your
instructions.
After the Constitutional
questions are resolved, we would like to have an unstructured, non-binding
discussion about the about the role of the Council and its relationship to the
House, and whether any changes are needed to this. We feel this is
important to prevent future misunderstandings and ensure that the Avery
governing structure can better reflect the Member’s concerns and
needs.
We hope that this course of
action will bring us to a suitable resolution and allow us to move forward in
meeting the needs of the House in a more satisfactory
fashion.
Thank
you.
John P.
Sadowski
Member, Avery
Council